Capital, people and business. Discover the differences on the map.
42 TERRITORIES · BALANCE SHEETS AND TENDERS 2025
Equity · RON
42 of 42 territories with values · Relative scale across counties in this selection · square-root spacing, anchored at zero. Colours are recalculated when the selection changes.▧ No data
Mehedinți · Alte activități de creditare · CAEN 6492 · balance sheets available for 2025
Sales
+41.8%
31 comparable companies · 2025 / 2024
Profitability
28.8%
30 eligible companies · 82.4% of companies with a known result are profitable
Concentration
76.8%
Share of the selection's turnover · 2025
Updated 9/18/2026, 2:44:30 PM · balance sheets 2025 / 2024
Turnover and jobs, by the companies' current registered office. Pick a county from the list to continue the analysis.
Mehedinți holds 0.6% of observed sales in the selected sector, with 34 companies.
Top 8 · 2025 balance sheets · share of the located-county total
Top 8 by reported average headcount · share of the located-county total
Compare the main activities in Mehedinți. Open a sector for details.
In Construcția de nave și structuri plutitoare (Rev.2) / Construcția de nave civile și structuri plutitoare (Rev.3), ten companies make 100% of sales. In Transport rutier de mărfuri, only 36.1%.
Concentration extremes among the top 8 sectors by turnover · share of observed sales, not market share
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
776.94M RON
413 comparable
36.1%
36.1%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
461.55M RON
23 comparable
98.7%
98.7%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
345.45M RON
45 comparable
89.7%
89.7%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
270.47M RON
30 comparable
90.2%
90.2%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
259.96M RON
144 comparable
60.9%
60.9%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
246.56M RON
9 comparable
100%
100%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
245.16M RON
287 comparable
44.9%
44.9%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
191.81M RON
1 comparable
100%
100%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
91.51M RON
59 comparable
76.4%
76.4%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
80.67M RON
23 comparable
94.9%
94.9%
One company, one main code. Growth uses the same companies in both years; missing values remain "—". CAEN definitions sit next to each name.
Beyond the giants: sales and margin of the company in the middle of the distribution.
The typical company sells 327.34K RON a year and keeps 28.8% of sales as net profit.
Companies by margin band · net profit / positive turnover
30 companies with a known profit and positive sales; 4 excluded. Bands describe margins, not bankruptcy risk.
Same companies, two years. Compare the change in sales with the change in jobs.
71% of the 31 comparable companies sold more in 2025 than in 2024.
Number of companies with comparable data, split by direction of change
Nominal changes in RON, not adjusted for inflation. Companies without data in one of the years are not compared.
Growth, survival, concentration, the trade register and state dependence in 2025: the national figure and the counties at both ends, for every map layer.
Turnover change at the same companies · % vs 2025−1
Nationally: +41.8% in 2025. Highest values: Caraș-Severin (+92.1%), Vâlcea (+57.1%), Brașov (+56.8%), Suceava (+55.4%), Neamț (+55%). Lowest: Constanța (+2.4%), Satu Mare (+4.4%), Bistrița-Năsăud (+7.1%), Botoșani (+8.1%), Bacău (+11.2%). 42 counties with data.
Average annual turnover growth at the same companies · % per year, 5 years
Nationally: +11.8% in 2025. Highest values: Călărași (+41.9%), Vâlcea (+38.6%), Ilfov (+33.2%), Argeș (+32%), Dolj (+31.2%). Lowest: Vaslui (+3.2%), Satu Mare (+5.1%), Alba (+8.3%), Neamț (+8.3%), Brașov (+9.2%). 42 counties with data.
Companies that filed five years ago and still file in 2025 · %
Nationally: 80.6% in 2025. Highest values: Teleorman (92.3%), Vrancea (90%), Covasna (85.7%), Ialomița (85.7%), Vaslui (83.3%). Lowest: Neamț (47.4%), Călărași (55.6%), Ilfov (57.6%), Alba (57.8%), Brașov (59%). 42 counties with data.
Companies with a net loss · % of those reporting a result
Nationally: 14.7% in 2025. Highest values: Suceava (47.4%), Teleorman (42.9%), Ilfov (39.4%), Bistrița-Năsăud (38.5%), Călărași (37.5%). Lowest: Sălaj (0%), Harghita (8.3%), Tulcea (9.1%), Bacău (14.7%), Mehedinți (14.7%). 42 counties with data.
Companies with negative equity · % of those reporting equity
Nationally: 8.8% in 2025. Highest values: Teleorman (42.9%), Timiș (36.8%), Bihor (36.4%), Suceava (31.6%), București (28.9%). Lowest: Sălaj (0%), Bistrița-Năsăud (7.7%), Neamț (8.3%), Harghita (8.3%), Mehedinți (8.8%). 42 counties with data.
Share of the top 10 companies in turnover · %
Nationally: 76.8% in 2025. Highest values: Maramureș (100%), Sibiu (99.2%), Ilfov (96.4%), Galați (95%), Iași (91.7%). Lowest: Hunedoara (59.7%), Prahova (68.4%), Bacău (69.8%), Dolj (70.3%), București (70.7%). 26 counties with data.
Median turnover · RON
Nationally: 327.34K RON in 2025. Highest values: Neamț (1.54M RON), Argeș (455.64K RON), Tulcea (388.63K RON), Arad (361.21K RON), București (350.26K RON). Lowest: Botoșani (52.1K RON), Maramureș (52.9K RON), Bistrița-Năsăud (53.13K RON), Cluj (84.55K RON), Galați (93.04K RON). 42 counties with data.
Turnover per employee · RON
Nationally: 430.64K RON in 2025. Highest values: Maramureș (1.11M RON), Ilfov (1.03M RON), Timiș (990.74K RON), Dâmbovița (983.71K RON), Tulcea (950.89K RON). Lowest: Satu Mare (195.19K RON), Hunedoara (223.66K RON), Vaslui (242.73K RON), Alba (254.61K RON), Suceava (273.77K RON). 42 counties with data.
The same aggregates as on the map, also available as tables, with a stable citation for every version.
Analysis: DemoANAF.ro · Mehedinți · CAEN 6492.
In Mehedinți, the 2025 report covers 34 companies with available indicators (CAEN 6492). This is the observed sample, not the number of all registered companies.
The median net margin is 28.8% in 2025, computed for 30 companies with positive sales and a known net result, including loss-making companies. 4 companies do not meet these conditions.
0 companies have strictly positive margins of at most 2% (0% of eligible companies). 2 eligible companies have negative margins.
28 of 34 companies with a known net result are profitable: 82.4%. The cumulative net result, after subtracting losses, is 6.93M RON.
The cumulative turnover of the 31 comparable companies changed by +41.8% between 2024 and 2025, in nominal RON.
| Territory / activity | Companies | Sales | Net profit | Employees | Equity | Median margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alba | 48 | 19.51M RON | 9M RON | 74 | 31.72M RON | 34.9% |
| Arad | 30 | 29.54M RON | 7.68M RON | 45 | 14.46M RON | 28.1% |
| Argeș | 74 | 317.76M RON | 27.29M RON | 487 | 229.43M RON | 21.7% |
| Bacău | 75 | 33.22M RON | 9.18M RON | 81 | 29.59M RON | 26% |
| Bihor | 55 | 25.66M RON | 10.72M RON | 80 | 42.64M RON | 30.1% |
| Bistrița-Năsăud | 13 | 6.4M RON | 984.6K RON | 18 | 4.47M RON | 11.8% |
| Botoșani | 15 | 34.65M RON | 7.9M RON | 66 | 20.9M RON | 14.6% |
| Brăila | 42 | 50.42M RON | 8.54M RON | 60 | 30.11M RON | 12.5% |
| Brașov | 32 | 40.28M RON | 11.61M RON | 61 | 26.83M RON | 23.9% |
| București | 256 | 830.85M RON | 176.98M RON | 1,057 | 801.36M RON | 18.2% |
| Buzău | 64 | 21.71M RON | 9.12M RON | 54 | 44.41M RON | 33.8% |
| Călărași | 8 | 9.37M RON | 2.29M RON | 10 | 7.22M RON | 24.4% |
| Caraș-Severin | 18 | 10.05M RON | 2.18M RON | 27 | 9.14M RON | 22.2% |
| Cluj | 54 | 30.67M RON | 9.7M RON | 87 | 18.25M RON | 19.9% |
| Constanța | 80 | 126.57M RON | 29.39M RON | 270 | 81.79M RON | 21.1% |
| Covasna | 12 | 7.26M RON | 1.82M RON | 12 | 3.71M RON | 25.3% |
| Dâmbovița | 14 | 31.8M RON | 6.15M RON | 32 | 19.56M RON | 20.4% |
| Dolj | 81 | 67.84M RON | 22.95M RON | 139 | 77.62M RON | 36.6% |
| Galați | 44 | 95.56M RON | 20.38M RON | 150 | 56.72M RON | 12.4% |
| Giurgiu | 19 | 10.55M RON | 3.09M RON | 24 | 8.32M RON | 32.9% |
| Gorj | 55 | 46.93M RON | 18.67M RON | 103 | 43.37M RON | 36% |
| Harghita | 12 | 7.67M RON | 2M RON | 20 | 6.57M RON | 28.1% |
| Hunedoara | 80 | 29.7M RON | 5.44M RON | 131 | 26.54M RON | 12.2% |
| Ialomița | 14 | 11.04M RON | 2.54M RON | 26 | 10.36M RON | 23.9% |
| Iași | 65 | 104.66M RON | 23.69M RON | 208 | 91.03M RON | 17.3% |
| Ilfov | 33 | 109.86M RON | 21.56M RON | 106 | 50.77M RON | 8.4% |
| Maramureș | 22 | 573.61M RON | 163.2M RON | 517 | 242.56M RON | 28.2% |
| Mehedinți | 34 | 19.81M RON | 6.93M RON | 46 | 13.9M RON | 28.8% |
| Mureș | 38 | 62.57M RON | 17.32M RON | 123 | 36.79M RON | 32.8% |
| Neamț | 12 | 96.43M RON | 24.49M RON | 187 | 75.6M RON | 24.9% |
| Olt | 59 | 35.78M RON | 21.94M RON | 108 | 50.41M RON | 53% |
| Prahova | 76 | 49.58M RON | 16.48M RON | 124 | 42.76M RON | 30.8% |
| Sălaj | 10 | 6.4M RON | 2.44M RON | 22 | 12.34M RON | 48.5% |
| Satu Mare | 17 | 4.25M RON | 1.13M RON | 18 | 7M RON | 22.8% |
| Sibiu | 20 | 17.56M RON | 3.45M RON | 27 | 8.95M RON | 24.7% |
| Suceava | 19 | 3.77M RON | 1.1M RON | 13 | 7.8M RON | 16.6% |
| Teleorman | 14 | 6.65M RON | 2.29M RON | 21 | 6.38M RON | 10.1% |
| Timiș | 38 | 66.28M RON | 17.95M RON | 63 | 27.27M RON | 23.7% |
| Tulcea | 11 | 20.92M RON | 7.32M RON | 22 | 20.39M RON | 37.2% |
| Vâlcea | 94 | 126.63M RON | 42.96M RON | 213 | 144.77M RON | 33.7% |
| Territory / activity | Companies | Sales | Net profit | Employees | Equity | Median margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drobeta-Turnu Severin | 31 | 19.62M RON | 6.89M RON | 44 | 13.52M RON | 28.8% |
| Strehaia | 2 | 132.69K RON | 11.48K RON | 1 | 373.15K RON | 18.1% |
| Cujmir | 1 | 61.76K RON | 22.45K RON | 1 | 10.19K RON | 36.3% |
National series independent of CAEN: initiation notices published in 2025, by the authority's current office. Values are estimates, not payments.
| Territory / activity | Notices | Value (RON) |
|---|---|---|
| Brașov | 834 | 5.85B RON |
| Ialomița | 180 | 1.07B RON |
| Iași | 1,086 | 14.34B RON |
| Tulcea | 177 | 1.17B RON |
| Mehedinți | 187 | 918.76M RON |
| Vâlcea | 384 | 2.27B RON |
| Mureș | 740 | 8.41B RON |
| București | 6,659 | 146.69B RON |
| Bacău | 429 | 2.57B RON |
| Maramureș | 371 | 2.83B RON |
| Botoșani | 321 | 1.32B RON |
| Brăila | 358 | 1.49B RON |
| Galați | 577 | 5.68B RON |
| Dâmbovița | 367 | 3.11B RON |
| Caraș-Severin | 241 | 1.42B RON |
| Hunedoara | 482 | 2.3B RON |
| Prahova | 552 | 4.43B RON |
| Călărași | 174 | 765.83M RON |
| Ilfov | 553 | 6.78B RON |
| Constanța | 757 | 7.24B RON |
| Bihor | 658 | 4.49B RON |
| Sibiu | 908 | 5.72B RON |
| Timiș | 915 | 8.62B RON |
| Olt | 304 | 1.2B RON |
| Cluj | 1,484 | 15.53B RON |
| Vaslui | 366 | 1.65B RON |
| Giurgiu | 171 | 1.94B RON |
| Neamț | 346 | 1.76B RON |
| Gorj | 601 | 3.25B RON |
| Sălaj | 265 | 1.1B RON |
| Alba | 359 | 1.58B RON |
| Suceava | 567 | 3.91B RON |
| Argeș | 532 | 2.2B RON |
| Dolj | 661 | 13.33B RON |
| Bistrița-Năsăud | 272 | 1.71B RON |
| Teleorman | 229 | 1.58B RON |
| Arad | 386 | 3.25B RON |
| Buzău | 278 | 1.02B RON |
| Vrancea | 277 | 3.31B RON |
| Covasna | 255 | 1.01B RON |
| Harghita | 333 | 2.68B RON |
| Satu Mare | 291 | 2.55B RON |
| Județ necunoscut | 22 | 21.89M RON |
| UAT Malovăț | 3 | 14.68M RON |
| UAT Dumbrava | 2 | 16.69M RON |
| UAT Drobeta-Turnu Severin | 106 | 580.93M RON |
| UAT Orșova | 2 | 2.51M RON |
| UAT Pătulele | 1 | 1.49M RON |
| UAT Izvoru Bârzii | 2 | 4.81M RON |
| UAT Broșteni | 1 | 4.74M RON |
| UAT Șovarna | 1 | 7.07M RON |
| UAT Podeni | 2 | 19.25M RON |
| UAT Cujmir | 1 | 201.43K RON |
| UAT Gârla Mare | 2 | 5.88M RON |
| UAT Ilovăț | 1 | 8M RON |
| UAT Salcia | 2 | 784.83K RON |
| UAT Breznița-Ocol | 2 | 6.97M RON |
| UAT Vânjuleț | 1 | 1.44M RON |
| UAT Obârșia de Câmp | 4 | 11.83M RON |
| UAT Pristol | 2 | 8.68M RON |
| UAT Vânători | 2 | 6.68M RON |
| UAT Bala | 1 | 590.72K RON |
| UAT Prunișor | 2 | 8.18M RON |
Computed on 9/18/2026, 2:44:30 PM · version 20260918114430147. Annual data may be revised when new balance sheets arrive.
DemoANAF.ro. Romania business report 2025 — Mehedinți, CAEN 6492. Version 20260918114430147, computed on 2026-09-18T11:44:30.147Z. https://demoanaf.ro/en/raport-afaceri-romania-2025?judet=Mehedin%C8%9Bi&caen=6492#date-raport Data: https://demoanaf.ro/rapoarte/afaceri-romania-2025/date.csv?rev=20260918114430147
SRL, SRL-D and SA registrations observed in Romania. National series, independent of the financial filters.
Most new companies appeared in July: 10,734 observed registrations.
Earliest available registration for each CUI · coverage not confirmed
Solid line: 2025
| Month | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Jan | 6,313 |
| Feb | 8,206 |
| Mar | 8,589 |
| Apr | 7,449 |
| May | 8,145 |
| Jun | 7,682 |
| Jul | 10,734 |
| Aug | 7,697 |
| Sep | 9,208 |
| Oct | 9,472 |
| Nov | 9,682 |
| Dec | 7,334 |
Coverage not confirmed: differences between series may reflect missing data. Months without observations do not mean zero.
Pace of distinct contracts recorded in SEAP. National series, by contract date.
The month with the most SEAP contracts was April: 12,765 distinct contracts.
A contract's lots and suppliers are not counted as separate contracts
Solid line: 2025
| Month | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Jan | 10,684 |
| Feb | 9,665 |
| Mar | 11,690 |
| Apr | 12,765 |
| May | 11,213 |
| Jun | 9,725 |
| Jul | 9,714 |
| Aug | 9,094 |
| Sep | 9,436 |
| Oct | 12,761 |
| Nov | 12,032 |
| Dec | 9,769 |
Period coverage is not confirmed. We count contracts, not payments; awarded values are not actual spending.
Every percentage must have a clear population, a period and a source.
We analyse companies with financial indicators available for 2025. This is not a census of all companies and does not implicitly cover only SRL/SA. The coverage of each indicator is shown separately.
Annual balance sheets do not measure H1 2026 results. Companies are linked by CUI. We compare only values available in both years. Geographic and CAEN groups are those of the 2025 cohort; we do not measure relocations or sector changes.
We use the main code from the balance sheet, normalised to four digits. Authorised activities are not summed. Short titles describe the activities; the exact Rev.2 and Rev.3 definitions sit next to each code. Where they differ, both are shown, without assuming the company's revision or historical equivalence.
A missing value stays unknown. Margins require positive turnover and a known net result, including losses. The median treats every company equally. The aggregate margin uses the sums of profit and sales for exactly the same eligible companies. The bands are: below 0%, exactly 0%, above 0% up to and including 2%, above 2% up to and including 5%, above 5% up to and including 10%, and above 10%. They are not solvency thresholds. Growth rates are undefined when the baseline is zero or negative.
Capital means equity (I10), including negative values, not turnover or share capital. Employees are the reported annual averages, attributed to the current office; the per-company average uses only companies with this indicator known. Tenders are initiation notices published in 2025, located by the authority's current office. Values are estimates, not payments. Colours use fixed numeric references, not ranks or quartiles. Margins have references at −10%, 0%, 2%, 5%, 10% and 20%; extreme values keep the exact number but saturate the colour. Totals use a logarithmic magnitude scale with references in the indicator's units. Each territory has a single observed value; we do not interpolate between localities. The same value keeps the same colour when the county, local unit or CAEN changes. Hatched areas have no values available. Local-unit boundaries come from ANCPI, processed by geo-spatial.org (2025). Localities are linked to local units through the INS SIRUTA 2025 nomenclature. Ambiguous addresses stay in the county total; local units use references adapted to local magnitude, constant across counties and years.
All amounts are reported in RON. Conversion to EUR uses the annual average rate published by BNR for the report year; for USD, and for years without a published average, we use the arithmetic mean of the European Central Bank's daily reference rates. Today's rate is never used. It is an indicative conversion for comparison, not an accounting revaluation.
The report is recomputed periodically from the available data. The generation date does not prove the source is complete. Changes to balance sheets may revise this edition's results.
Sources: ANAF — balance sheets; ONRC — company register; SEAP / data.gov.ro — contracts. See the data sources. Download the SVG map · ANCPI boundaries · geo-spatial.org · INS · SIRUTA 2025
