Capital, people and business. Discover the differences on the map.
42 TERRITORIES · BALANCE SHEETS AND TENDERS 2025
Equity · RON
38 of 42 territories with values · Relative scale across counties in this selection · square-root spacing, anchored at zero. Colours are recalculated when the selection changes.▧ No data
Ialomița · Comerț cu ridicata de componente și echipamente electronice și de telecomunicații · CAEN 4652 · balance sheets available for 2025
Sales
+279%
2 comparable companies · 2025 / 2024
Profitability
27%
2 eligible companies · 50% of companies with a known result are profitable
Concentration
100%
Share of the selection's turnover · 2025
Updated 9/18/2026, 8:47:03 PM · balance sheets 2025 / 2024
Turnover and jobs, by the companies' current registered office. Pick a county from the list to continue the analysis.
Ialomița holds 0.1% of observed sales in the selected sector, with 4 companies.
Top 8 · 2025 balance sheets · share of the located-county total
Top 8 by reported average headcount · share of the located-county total
Compare the main activities in Ialomița. Open a sector for details.
In Fabricarea uleiurilor și grăsimilor, ten companies make 100% of sales. In Comerț alimentar nespecializat, only 25.2%.
SECTOR RADIOGRAPHY
Concentration extremes among the top 8 sectors by turnover · share of observed sales, not market share
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
2.08B RON
2 comparable
100%
100%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
1.53B RON
343 comparable
34.2%
34.2%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
691.56M RON
49 comparable
87.5%
87.5%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
663.18M RON
552 comparable
25.2%
25.2%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
514.85M RON
443 comparable
39.2%
39.2%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
438.72M RON
13 comparable
100%
100%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
380.46M RON
17 comparable
99.6%
99.6%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
315.58M RON
41 comparable
86.1%
86.1%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
302.61M RON
49 comparable
82.5%
82.5%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
227.72M RON
149 comparable
63.3%
63.3%
One company, one main code. Growth uses the same companies in both years; missing values remain "—". CAEN definitions sit next to each name.
Beyond the giants: sales and margin of the company in the middle of the distribution.
The typical company sells 163.34K RON a year and keeps 27% of sales as net profit.
Companies by margin band · net profit / positive turnover
2 companies with a known profit and positive sales; 2 excluded. Bands describe margins, not bankruptcy risk.
Same companies, two years. Compare the change in sales with the change in jobs.
100% of the 2 comparable companies sold more in 2025 than in 2024.
Number of companies with comparable data, split by direction of change
Nominal changes in RON, not adjusted for inflation. Companies without data in one of the years are not compared.
Growth, survival, concentration, the trade register and state dependence in 2025: the national figure and the counties at both ends, for every map layer.
Turnover change at the same companies · % vs 2025−1
Highest values: Prahova (+52.1%), Brașov (+40.8%), Bihor (+21.8%), Bacău (+21.4%), Cluj (+17%). Lowest: Constanța (-34.6%), Vâlcea (-15%), Dolj (-12%), Ilfov (-1.3%), Maramureș (+0.5%). 17 counties with data.
Average annual turnover growth at the same companies · % per year, 5 years
Highest values: Prahova (+30.5%), Brașov (+18.9%), Sibiu (+17.2%), Bihor (+16.6%), Cluj (+9.4%). Lowest: Constanța (-18.4%), Dolj (-6.4%), Vâlcea (-4.5%), București (-1.7%), Timiș (+5.7%). 12 counties with data.
Companies that filed five years ago and still file in 2025 · %
Nationally: 60% in 2025. Highest values: Bacău (90%), Neamț (87.5%), Sibiu (86.4%), Dolj (85.7%), Maramureș (83.3%). Lowest: Argeș (28.6%), Arad (46.7%), Constanța (50%), Brăila (57.1%), Teleorman (60%). 28 counties with data.
Companies with a net loss · % of those reporting a result
Highest values: Galați (71.4%), Iași (60%), Prahova (60%), Constanța (58.3%), Vâlcea (57.1%). Lowest: Maramureș (0%), Mureș (12.5%), Alba (14.3%), Cluj (21.9%), Timiș (25.9%). 19 counties with data.
Companies with negative equity · % of those reporting equity
Highest values: Sibiu (46.7%), Argeș (42.9%), Brașov (42.9%), Galați (42.9%), Vâlcea (42.9%). Lowest: Cluj (15.6%), Ilfov (15.8%), Maramureș (16.7%), Bacău (16.7%), Prahova (20%). 19 counties with data.
Share of the top 10 companies in turnover · %
Highest values: Brașov (100%), Timiș (98.9%), Bihor (98%), Cluj (94.6%), Ilfov (85%). Lowest: București (84.9%). 6 counties with data.
Median turnover · RON
Nationally: 163.34K RON in 2025. Highest values: Caraș-Severin (32.56M RON), Mureș (1.11M RON), Cluj (833.91K RON), Prahova (692.95K RON), Sălaj (635.19K RON). Lowest: Giurgiu (1.61K RON), Suceava (5.17K RON), Iași (7.26K RON), Tulcea (13.8K RON), Arad (29.97K RON). 38 counties with data.
Turnover per employee · RON
Nationally: 326.68K RON in 2025. Highest values: București (3.32M RON), Brașov (3.16M RON), Maramureș (2.52M RON), Neamț (1.31M RON), Harghita (1.16M RON). Lowest: Suceava (10.34K RON), Argeș (167.7K RON), Constanța (207.14K RON), Teleorman (220.38K RON), Satu Mare (226.68K RON). 35 counties with data.
The same aggregates as on the map, also available as tables, with a stable citation for every version.
Analysis: DemoANAF.ro · Ialomița · CAEN 4652.
In Ialomița, the 2025 report covers 4 companies with available indicators (CAEN 4652). This is the observed sample, not the number of all registered companies.
The median net margin is 27% in 2025, computed for 2 companies with positive sales and a known net result, including loss-making companies. 2 companies do not meet these conditions.
0 companies have strictly positive margins of at most 2% (0% of eligible companies). 0 eligible companies have negative margins.
2 of 4 companies with a known net result are profitable: 50%. The cumulative net result, after subtracting losses, is 1.89M RON.
The cumulative turnover of the 2 comparable companies changed by +279% between 2024 and 2025, in nominal RON.
| Territory / activity | Companies | Sales | Net profit | Employees | Equity | Median margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alba | 7 | 2.92M RON | 399.82K RON | 9 | 512.59K RON | 6.4% |
| Arad | 4 | 621.12K RON | -10.72K RON | 2 | 673.42K RON | 5.2% |
| Argeș | 7 | 1.15M RON | 177.44K RON | 7 | 23.96K RON | 34.3% |
| Bacău | 6 | 3.16M RON | 1.7M RON | 3 | 1.78M RON | 60.4% |
| Bihor | 28 | 44.87M RON | 4.33M RON | 49 | 17.42M RON | 13.6% |
| Bistrița-Năsăud | 6 | 706.59K RON | -37.86K RON | 2 | 364.81K RON | 7.3% |
| Botoșani | 3 | 2.36M RON | 344.75K RON | 6 | 1.44M RON | 16.9% |
| Brăila | 4 | 2.61M RON | 371.52K RON | 7 | 579.11K RON | -43.4% |
| Brașov | 21 | 158.1M RON | 7.82M RON | 50 | 17.59M RON | 4.2% |
| București | 205 | 4.4B RON | 166.7M RON | 1,200 | 377.16M RON | 5% |
| Buzău | 2 | 674.55K RON | 21.86K RON | 0 | -66.32K RON | 3.5% |
| Caraș-Severin | 3 | 73.33M RON | 2.31M RON | 77 | 57.99M RON | 4.7% |
| Cluj | 32 | 162.21M RON | 12.97M RON | 162 | 114.87M RON | 4.3% |
| Constanța | 12 | 2.15M RON | 3.61K RON | 8 | 673.34K RON | 0.4% |
| Covasna | 3 | 6.23M RON | 568.73K RON | 8 | 1.77M RON | 3.3% |
| Dâmbovița | 4 | 2.47M RON | -70.54K RON | 6 | 377.38K RON | 1% |
| Dolj | 10 | 6.21M RON | 126.5K RON | 13 | 870.69K RON | 1.2% |
| Galați | 7 | 13.31M RON | 2.54M RON | 25 | 5.39M RON | -3.7% |
| Giurgiu | 3 | 472.87K RON | 361.14K RON | 1 | 347.8K RON | -155.7% |
| Harghita | 3 | 5.88M RON | 120.82K RON | 5 | 97.75K RON | -8.4% |
| Hunedoara | 3 | 2.27M RON | 67.91K RON | 7 | 623K RON | 5.1% |
| Ialomița | 4 | 6.81M RON | 1.89M RON | 1 | 1.79M RON | 27% |
| Iași | 5 | 2.39M RON | 354.66K RON | 3 | 1.97M RON | 3% |
| Ilfov | 38 | 74.58M RON | 9.67M RON | 64 | 19.86M RON | 6.1% |
| Maramureș | 6 | 37.79M RON | 511.38K RON | 15 | 6.32M RON | 1.8% |
| Mureș | 8 | 147.36M RON | 6.85M RON | 171 | 33.89M RON | 3.6% |
| Neamț | 4 | 53.7M RON | 6.86M RON | 41 | 63.28M RON | -7.1% |
| Olt | 2 | 523.81K RON | 19.38K RON | — | 77.75K RON | 7.2% |
| Prahova | 10 | 20.5M RON | 1.32M RON | 44 | 4.56M RON | -1.9% |
| Sălaj | 2 | 1.27M RON | 57.2K RON | 2 | 42.39K RON | 6.7% |
| Satu Mare | 2 | 271.96K RON | 40.65K RON | 1 | -613.59K RON | 28.5% |
| Sibiu | 15 | 16.92M RON | 1.03M RON | 31 | 10.06M RON | 9.2% |
| Suceava | 2 | 10.34K RON | -23.44K RON | 1 | 245.79K RON | -222.3% |
| Teleorman | 1 | 440.77K RON | 46.14K RON | 2 | 87.3K RON | 10.5% |
| Timiș | 27 | 76.61M RON | 4.78M RON | 77 | 23.8M RON | 8.4% |
| Tulcea | 1 | 13.8K RON | -9.71K RON | 0 | 76.4K RON | -70.3% |
| Vâlcea | 7 | 2.79M RON | 176.63K RON | 6 | 2.79M RON | 1.2% |
| Vrancea | 1 | 422.97K RON | 78.74K RON | 1 | 32.57K RON | 18.6% |
National series independent of CAEN: initiation notices published in 2025, by the authority's current office. Values are estimates, not payments.
| Territory / activity | Notices | Value (RON) |
|---|---|---|
| Brașov | 834 | 5.85B RON |
| Ialomița | 180 | 1.07B RON |
| Iași | 1,086 | 14.34B RON |
| Tulcea | 177 | 1.17B RON |
| Mehedinți | 187 | 918.76M RON |
| Vâlcea | 384 | 2.27B RON |
| Mureș | 740 | 8.41B RON |
| București | 6,659 | 146.69B RON |
| Bacău | 429 | 2.57B RON |
| Maramureș | 371 | 2.83B RON |
| Botoșani | 321 | 1.32B RON |
| Brăila | 358 | 1.49B RON |
| Galați | 577 | 5.68B RON |
| Dâmbovița | 367 | 3.11B RON |
| Caraș-Severin | 241 | 1.42B RON |
| Hunedoara | 482 | 2.3B RON |
| Prahova | 552 | 4.43B RON |
| Călărași | 174 | 765.83M RON |
| Ilfov | 553 | 6.78B RON |
| Constanța | 757 | 7.24B RON |
| Bihor | 658 | 4.49B RON |
| Sibiu | 908 | 5.72B RON |
| Timiș | 915 | 8.62B RON |
| Olt | 304 | 1.2B RON |
| Cluj | 1,484 | 15.53B RON |
| Vaslui | 366 | 1.65B RON |
| Giurgiu | 171 | 1.94B RON |
| Neamț | 346 | 1.76B RON |
| Gorj | 601 | 3.25B RON |
| Sălaj | 265 | 1.1B RON |
| Alba | 359 | 1.58B RON |
| Suceava | 567 | 3.91B RON |
| Argeș | 532 | 2.2B RON |
| Dolj | 661 | 13.33B RON |
| Bistrița-Năsăud | 272 | 1.71B RON |
| Teleorman | 229 | 1.58B RON |
| Arad | 386 | 3.25B RON |
| Buzău | 278 | 1.02B RON |
| Vrancea | 277 | 3.31B RON |
| Covasna | 255 | 1.01B RON |
| Harghita | 333 | 2.68B RON |
| Satu Mare | 291 | 2.55B RON |
| Județ necunoscut | 22 | 21.89M RON |
| UAT Slobozia | 86 | 703.17M RON |
| UAT Fetești | 8 | 25.51M RON |
| UAT Urziceni | 2 | 14.1M RON |
Computed on 9/18/2026, 8:47:03 PM · version 20260918174703963. Annual data may be revised when new balance sheets arrive.
DemoANAF.ro. Romania business report 2025 — Ialomița, CAEN 4652. Version 20260918174703963, computed on 2026-09-18T17:47:03.963Z. https://demoanaf.ro/en/raport-afaceri-romania-2025?judet=Ialomi%C8%9Ba&caen=4652#date-raport Data: https://demoanaf.ro/rapoarte/afaceri-romania-2025/date.csv?rev=20260918174703963
SRL, SRL-D and SA registrations observed in Romania. National series, independent of the financial filters.
Most new companies appeared in July: 10,734 observed registrations.
Earliest available registration for each CUI · coverage not confirmed
Solid line: 2025
| Month | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Jan | 6,313 |
| Feb | 8,206 |
| Mar | 8,589 |
| Apr | 7,449 |
| May | 8,145 |
| Jun | 7,682 |
| Jul | 10,734 |
| Aug | 7,697 |
| Sep | 9,208 |
| Oct | 9,472 |
| Nov | 9,682 |
| Dec | 7,334 |
Coverage not confirmed: differences between series may reflect missing data. Months without observations do not mean zero.
Pace of distinct contracts recorded in SEAP. National series, by contract date.
The month with the most SEAP contracts was April: 12,765 distinct contracts.
A contract's lots and suppliers are not counted as separate contracts
Solid line: 2025
| Month | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Jan | 10,684 |
| Feb | 9,665 |
| Mar | 11,690 |
| Apr | 12,765 |
| May | 11,213 |
| Jun | 9,725 |
| Jul | 9,714 |
| Aug | 9,094 |
| Sep | 9,436 |
| Oct | 12,761 |
| Nov | 12,032 |
| Dec | 9,769 |
Period coverage is not confirmed. We count contracts, not payments; awarded values are not actual spending.
Every percentage must have a clear population, a period and a source.
We analyse companies with financial indicators available for 2025. This is not a census of all companies and does not implicitly cover only SRL/SA. The coverage of each indicator is shown separately.
Annual balance sheets do not measure H1 2026 results. Companies are linked by CUI. We compare only values available in both years. Geographic and CAEN groups are those of the 2025 cohort; we do not measure relocations or sector changes.
We use the main code from the balance sheet, normalised to four digits. Authorised activities are not summed. Short titles describe the activities; the exact Rev.2 and Rev.3 definitions sit next to each code. Where they differ, both are shown, without assuming the company's revision or historical equivalence.
A missing value stays unknown. Margins require positive turnover and a known net result, including losses. The median treats every company equally. The aggregate margin uses the sums of profit and sales for exactly the same eligible companies. The bands are: below 0%, exactly 0%, above 0% up to and including 2%, above 2% up to and including 5%, above 5% up to and including 10%, and above 10%. They are not solvency thresholds. Growth rates are undefined when the baseline is zero or negative.
Capital means equity (I10), including negative values, not turnover or share capital. Employees are the reported annual averages, attributed to the current office; the per-company average uses only companies with this indicator known. Tenders are initiation notices published in 2025, located by the authority's current office. Values are estimates, not payments. Colours use fixed numeric references, not ranks or quartiles. Margins have references at −10%, 0%, 2%, 5%, 10% and 20%; extreme values keep the exact number but saturate the colour. Totals use a logarithmic magnitude scale with references in the indicator's units. Each territory has a single observed value; we do not interpolate between localities. The same value keeps the same colour when the county, local unit or CAEN changes. Hatched areas have no values available. Local-unit boundaries come from ANCPI, processed by geo-spatial.org (2025). Localities are linked to local units through the INS SIRUTA 2025 nomenclature. Ambiguous addresses stay in the county total; local units use references adapted to local magnitude, constant across counties and years.
All amounts are reported in RON. Conversion to EUR uses the annual average rate published by BNR for the report year; for USD, and for years without a published average, we use the arithmetic mean of the European Central Bank's daily reference rates. Today's rate is never used. It is an indicative conversion for comparison, not an accounting revaluation.
The report is recomputed periodically from the available data. The generation date does not prove the source is complete. Changes to balance sheets may revise this edition's results.
Sources: ANAF — balance sheets; ONRC — company register; SEAP / data.gov.ro — contracts. See the data sources. Download the SVG map · ANCPI boundaries · geo-spatial.org · INS · SIRUTA 2025
