Capital, people and business. Discover the differences on the map.
42 TERRITORIES · BALANCE SHEETS AND TENDERS 2025
Equity · RON
19 of 42 territories with values · Relative scale across counties in this selection · square-root spacing, anchored at zero. Colours are recalculated when the selection changes.▧ No data
Maramureș · Fabricarea produselor obținute din prelucrarea țițeiului · CAEN 1920 · balance sheets available for 2025
Sales
—
0 comparable companies · 2025 / 2024
Profitability
—
0 eligible companies · 100% of companies with a known result are profitable
Concentration
—
Share of the selection's turnover · 2025
Updated 9/18/2026, 8:47:03 PM · balance sheets 2025 / 2024
Turnover and jobs, by the companies' current registered office. Pick a county from the list to continue the analysis.
Top 8 · 2025 balance sheets · share of the located-county total
Top 8 by reported average headcount · share of the located-county total
Compare the main activities in Maramureș. Open a sector for details.
In Fabricarea aparatelor de control și distribuție a electricității (Rev.2) / Fabricarea aparatelor de distribuție și control a electricității (Rev.3), ten companies make 100% of sales. In Transport rutier de mărfuri, only 27.4%.
SECTOR RADIOGRAPHY
Concentration extremes among the top 8 sectors by turnover · share of observed sales, not market share
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
3.38B RON
42 comparable
99.4%
99.4%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
2.01B RON
1,019 comparable
27.4%
27.4%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
1.85B RON
6 comparable
100%
100%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
1.61B RON
2 comparable
100%
100%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
1.18B RON
899 comparable
33.5%
33.5%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
995.94M RON
536 comparable
33.7%
33.7%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
961.21M RON
47 comparable
93.3%
93.3%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
879.56M RON
88 comparable
82.2%
82.2%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
833.92M RON
264 comparable
66.4%
66.4%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
595.31M RON
108 comparable
73.2%
73.2%
One company, one main code. Growth uses the same companies in both years; missing values remain "—". CAEN definitions sit next to each name.
Beyond the giants: sales and margin of the company in the middle of the distribution.
Companies by margin band · net profit / positive turnover
0 companies with a known profit and positive sales; 1 excluded. Bands describe margins, not bankruptcy risk.
Same companies, two years. Compare the change in sales with the change in jobs.
Number of companies with comparable data, split by direction of change
Nominal changes in RON, not adjusted for inflation. Companies without data in one of the years are not compared.
Growth, survival, concentration, the trade register and state dependence in 2025: the national figure and the counties at both ends, for every map layer.
Turnover change at the same companies · % vs 2025−1
Highest values: Giurgiu (-1.6%), Bacău (-27.8%). Lowest: . 2 counties with data.
Average annual turnover growth at the same companies · % per year, 5 years
Highest values: Giurgiu (+10.5%), Prahova (-24.6%). Lowest: . 2 counties with data.
Companies that filed five years ago and still file in 2025 · %
Highest values: Giurgiu (100%), Prahova (81.8%), București (80%), Bacău (66.7%), Brașov (60%). Lowest: . 5 counties with data.
Companies with a net loss · % of those reporting a result
Highest values: Bacău (80%), Prahova (71.4%), Giurgiu (0%). Lowest: . 3 counties with data.
Companies with negative equity · % of those reporting equity
Highest values: Prahova (71.4%), Bacău (60%), Giurgiu (20%). Lowest: . 3 counties with data.
Median turnover · RON
Highest values: Brăila (21.77M RON), Constanța (17.26M RON), Botoșani (11.74M RON), București (7.46M RON), Olt (7.37M RON). Lowest: Vâlcea (0 RON), Prahova (0 RON), Cluj (0 RON), Bacău (0 RON), Gorj (960 RON). 18 counties with data.
Turnover per employee · RON
Highest values: Constanța (14.41M RON), Brașov (3.18M RON), București (1.83M RON), Prahova (1.41M RON), Dâmbovița (1.08M RON). Lowest: Argeș (3.4K RON), Buzău (30K RON), Bihor (177.75K RON), Giurgiu (269.37K RON), Tulcea (309.83K RON). 14 counties with data.
The same aggregates as on the map, also available as tables, with a stable citation for every version.
Analysis: DemoANAF.ro · Maramureș · CAEN 1920.
In Maramureș, the 2025 report covers 1 companies with available indicators (CAEN 1920). This is the observed sample, not the number of all registered companies.
0 companies have strictly positive margins of at most 2% (— of eligible companies). 0 eligible companies have negative margins.
1 of 1 companies with a known net result are profitable: 100%. The cumulative net result, after subtracting losses, is 5.07K RON.
| Territory / activity | Companies | Sales | Net profit | Employees | Equity | Median margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argeș | 2 | 3.4K RON | -45.71K RON | 1 | -386.45K RON | -1,149.2% |
| Bacău | 5 | 230.42K RON | -48.03K RON | 0 | -1.38B RON | 1.9% |
| Bihor | 1 | 177.75K RON | -490.14K RON | 1 | -168.82M RON | -275.7% |
| Botoșani | 1 | 11.74M RON | 936.81K RON | 0 | 201.46M RON | 8% |
| Brăila | 1 | 21.77M RON | 1.08M RON | 46 | 5.65M RON | 5% |
| Brașov | 3 | 505.89M RON | 27.93M RON | 159 | 68.45M RON | 5.5% |
| București | 2 | 14.92M RON | -582.49K RON | 8 | 8.17M RON | -2.1% |
| Buzău | 1 | 30K RON | -39.52K RON | 1 | -28.71K RON | -131.7% |
| Cluj | 1 | 0 RON | 0 RON | 0 | 14.31K RON | — |
| Constanța | 4 | 17.35B RON | 269.7M RON | 1,204 | 1.83B RON | 2.1% |
| Dâmbovița | 1 | 3.25M RON | 1.09M RON | 3 | 1.09M RON | 33.6% |
| Giurgiu | 5 | 21.82M RON | 2.05M RON | 81 | 18.84M RON | 12.2% |
| Gorj | 3 | 1.59M RON | -709.83K RON | 3 | 1.75M RON | -439.6% |
| Maramureș | 1 | — | 5.07K RON | — | 7.67K RON | — |
| Olt | 1 | 7.37M RON | -110.15K RON | 16 | 8.71M RON | -1.5% |
| Prahova | 7 | 927.37M RON | -44.02M RON | 660 | -334.64M RON | 5.1% |
| Sălaj | 1 | 6.09M RON | 214.82K RON | 6 | -1.23M RON | 3.5% |
| Tulcea | 1 | 4.65M RON | 108.76K RON | 15 | 667.13K RON | 2.3% |
| Vâlcea | 1 | 0 RON | -82.98K RON | 0 | -2.96M RON | — |
| Territory / activity | Companies | Sales | Net profit | Employees | Equity | Median margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borșa | 1 | — | 5.07K RON | — | 7.67K RON | — |
National series independent of CAEN: initiation notices published in 2025, by the authority's current office. Values are estimates, not payments.
| Territory / activity | Notices | Value (RON) |
|---|---|---|
| Brașov | 834 | 5.85B RON |
| Ialomița | 180 | 1.07B RON |
| Iași | 1,086 | 14.34B RON |
| Tulcea | 177 | 1.17B RON |
| Mehedinți | 187 | 918.76M RON |
| Vâlcea | 384 | 2.27B RON |
| Mureș | 740 | 8.41B RON |
| București | 6,659 | 146.69B RON |
| Bacău | 429 | 2.57B RON |
| Maramureș | 371 | 2.83B RON |
| Botoșani | 321 | 1.32B RON |
| Brăila | 358 | 1.49B RON |
| Galați | 577 | 5.68B RON |
| Dâmbovița | 367 | 3.11B RON |
| Caraș-Severin | 241 | 1.42B RON |
| Hunedoara | 482 | 2.3B RON |
| Prahova | 552 | 4.43B RON |
| Călărași | 174 | 765.83M RON |
| Ilfov | 553 | 6.78B RON |
| Constanța | 757 | 7.24B RON |
| Bihor | 658 | 4.49B RON |
| Sibiu | 908 | 5.72B RON |
| Timiș | 915 | 8.62B RON |
| Olt | 304 | 1.2B RON |
| Cluj | 1,484 | 15.53B RON |
| Vaslui | 366 | 1.65B RON |
| Giurgiu | 171 | 1.94B RON |
| Neamț | 346 | 1.76B RON |
| Gorj | 601 | 3.25B RON |
| Sălaj | 265 | 1.1B RON |
| Alba | 359 | 1.58B RON |
| Suceava | 567 | 3.91B RON |
| Argeș | 532 | 2.2B RON |
| Dolj | 661 | 13.33B RON |
| Bistrița-Năsăud | 272 | 1.71B RON |
| Teleorman | 229 | 1.58B RON |
| Arad | 386 | 3.25B RON |
| Buzău | 278 | 1.02B RON |
| Vrancea | 277 | 3.31B RON |
| Covasna | 255 | 1.01B RON |
| Harghita | 333 | 2.68B RON |
| Satu Mare | 291 | 2.55B RON |
| Județ necunoscut | 22 | 21.89M RON |
| UAT Baia Mare | 171 | 2.15B RON |
| UAT Sighetu Marmației | 33 | 190.93M RON |
| UAT Vișeu de Jos | 1 | 1.27M RON |
| UAT Tăuții-Măgherăuș | 1 | 3.57M RON |
| UAT Bocicoiu Mare | 2 | 848.51K RON |
Computed on 9/18/2026, 8:47:03 PM · version 20260918174703963. Annual data may be revised when new balance sheets arrive.
DemoANAF.ro. Romania business report 2025 — Maramureș, CAEN 1920. Version 20260918174703963, computed on 2026-09-18T17:47:03.963Z. https://demoanaf.ro/en/raport-afaceri-romania-2025?judet=Maramure%C8%99&caen=1920#date-raport Data: https://demoanaf.ro/rapoarte/afaceri-romania-2025/date.csv?rev=20260918174703963
SRL, SRL-D and SA registrations observed in Romania. National series, independent of the financial filters.
Most new companies appeared in July: 10,734 observed registrations.
Earliest available registration for each CUI · coverage not confirmed
Solid line: 2025
| Month | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Jan | 6,313 |
| Feb | 8,206 |
| Mar | 8,589 |
| Apr | 7,449 |
| May | 8,145 |
| Jun | 7,682 |
| Jul | 10,734 |
| Aug | 7,697 |
| Sep | 9,208 |
| Oct | 9,472 |
| Nov | 9,682 |
| Dec | 7,334 |
Coverage not confirmed: differences between series may reflect missing data. Months without observations do not mean zero.
Pace of distinct contracts recorded in SEAP. National series, by contract date.
The month with the most SEAP contracts was April: 12,765 distinct contracts.
A contract's lots and suppliers are not counted as separate contracts
Solid line: 2025
| Month | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Jan | 10,684 |
| Feb | 9,665 |
| Mar | 11,690 |
| Apr | 12,765 |
| May | 11,213 |
| Jun | 9,725 |
| Jul | 9,714 |
| Aug | 9,094 |
| Sep | 9,436 |
| Oct | 12,761 |
| Nov | 12,032 |
| Dec | 9,769 |
Period coverage is not confirmed. We count contracts, not payments; awarded values are not actual spending.
Every percentage must have a clear population, a period and a source.
We analyse companies with financial indicators available for 2025. This is not a census of all companies and does not implicitly cover only SRL/SA. The coverage of each indicator is shown separately.
Annual balance sheets do not measure H1 2026 results. Companies are linked by CUI. We compare only values available in both years. Geographic and CAEN groups are those of the 2025 cohort; we do not measure relocations or sector changes.
We use the main code from the balance sheet, normalised to four digits. Authorised activities are not summed. Short titles describe the activities; the exact Rev.2 and Rev.3 definitions sit next to each code. Where they differ, both are shown, without assuming the company's revision or historical equivalence.
A missing value stays unknown. Margins require positive turnover and a known net result, including losses. The median treats every company equally. The aggregate margin uses the sums of profit and sales for exactly the same eligible companies. The bands are: below 0%, exactly 0%, above 0% up to and including 2%, above 2% up to and including 5%, above 5% up to and including 10%, and above 10%. They are not solvency thresholds. Growth rates are undefined when the baseline is zero or negative.
Capital means equity (I10), including negative values, not turnover or share capital. Employees are the reported annual averages, attributed to the current office; the per-company average uses only companies with this indicator known. Tenders are initiation notices published in 2025, located by the authority's current office. Values are estimates, not payments. Colours use fixed numeric references, not ranks or quartiles. Margins have references at −10%, 0%, 2%, 5%, 10% and 20%; extreme values keep the exact number but saturate the colour. Totals use a logarithmic magnitude scale with references in the indicator's units. Each territory has a single observed value; we do not interpolate between localities. The same value keeps the same colour when the county, local unit or CAEN changes. Hatched areas have no values available. Local-unit boundaries come from ANCPI, processed by geo-spatial.org (2025). Localities are linked to local units through the INS SIRUTA 2025 nomenclature. Ambiguous addresses stay in the county total; local units use references adapted to local magnitude, constant across counties and years.
All amounts are reported in RON. Conversion to EUR uses the annual average rate published by BNR for the report year; for USD, and for years without a published average, we use the arithmetic mean of the European Central Bank's daily reference rates. Today's rate is never used. It is an indicative conversion for comparison, not an accounting revaluation.
The report is recomputed periodically from the available data. The generation date does not prove the source is complete. Changes to balance sheets may revise this edition's results.
Sources: ANAF — balance sheets; ONRC — company register; SEAP / data.gov.ro — contracts. See the data sources. Download the SVG map · ANCPI boundaries · geo-spatial.org · INS · SIRUTA 2025
