Capital, people and business. Discover the differences on the map.
42 TERRITORIES · BALANCE SHEETS AND TENDERS 2025
Equity · RON
42 of 42 territories with values · Relative scale across counties in this selection · square-root spacing, anchored at zero. Colours are recalculated when the selection changes.▧ No data
Prahova · Tăierea și rindeluirea lemnului · CAEN 1611 · balance sheets available for 2025
Sales
+2.4%
6 comparable companies · 2025 / 2024
Profitability
8.8%
7 eligible companies · 55.6% of companies with a known result are profitable
Concentration
100%
Share of the selection's turnover · 2025
Updated 9/18/2026, 8:47:03 PM · balance sheets 2025 / 2024
Turnover and jobs, by the companies' current registered office. Pick a county from the list to continue the analysis.
Prahova holds 0.3% of observed sales in the selected sector, with 9 companies.
Top 8 · 2025 balance sheets · share of the located-county total
Top 8 by reported average headcount · share of the located-county total
Compare the main activities in Prahova. Open a sector for details.
In Fabricarea utilajelor pentru extracție și construcții, ten companies make 100% of sales. In Transport rutier de mărfuri, only 35.9%.
SECTOR RADIOGRAPHY
Concentration extremes among the top 8 sectors by turnover · share of observed sales, not market share
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
4.21B RON
299 comparable
86%
86%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
3.31B RON
52 comparable
97%
97%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
2.91B RON
1,267 comparable
35.9%
35.9%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
2.02B RON
1,142 comparable
52.8%
52.8%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
2B RON
8 comparable
100%
100%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
1.81B RON
136 comparable
95.7%
95.7%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
1.69B RON
256 comparable
59.7%
59.7%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
1.52B RON
25 comparable
99.2%
99.2%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
1.45B RON
1,437 comparable
16.4%
16.4%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
1.39B RON
30 comparable
99.9%
99.9%
One company, one main code. Growth uses the same companies in both years; missing values remain "—". CAEN definitions sit next to each name.
Beyond the giants: sales and margin of the company in the middle of the distribution.
The typical company sells 171.28K RON a year and keeps 8.8% of sales as net profit.
Companies by margin band · net profit / positive turnover
7 companies with a known profit and positive sales; 2 excluded. Bands describe margins, not bankruptcy risk.
Same companies, two years. Compare the change in sales with the change in jobs.
50% of the 6 comparable companies sold more in 2025 than in 2024.
Number of companies with comparable data, split by direction of change
Nominal changes in RON, not adjusted for inflation. Companies without data in one of the years are not compared.
Growth, survival, concentration, the trade register and state dependence in 2025: the national figure and the counties at both ends, for every map layer.
Turnover change at the same companies · % vs 2025−1
Nationally: +2.4% in 2025. Highest values: Bistrița-Năsăud (+17.8%), Neamț (+17.5%), Bihor (+16.6%), Harghita (+15.5%), Bacău (+14.8%). Lowest: Maramureș (-27.4%), Buzău (-20.7%), Gorj (-20.5%), Alba (-19.6%), Caraș-Severin (-16%). 26 counties with data.
Average annual turnover growth at the same companies · % per year, 5 years
Nationally: +12.4% in 2025. Highest values: Covasna (+84.3%), Timiș (+15.9%), Prahova (+12.4%), Vâlcea (+12.2%), Bistrița-Năsăud (+12%). Lowest: București (-30.1%), Maramureș (-6.8%), Arad (-5.5%), Mureș (-1.4%), Buzău (-0.2%). 26 counties with data.
Companies with a net loss · % of those reporting a result
Nationally: 44.4% in 2025. Highest values: Bihor (55%), București (54.5%), Sibiu (53.3%), Alba (51.4%), Ilfov (50%). Lowest: Dâmbovița (0%), Gorj (12.5%), Satu Mare (14.3%), Iași (20%), Hunedoara (28.6%). 29 counties with data.
Companies with negative equity · % of those reporting equity
Nationally: 55.6% in 2025. Highest values: Prahova (55.6%), Ilfov (50%), Vrancea (50%), București (45.5%), Bihor (40%). Lowest: Dâmbovița (0%), Caraș-Severin (19%), Iași (20%), Suceava (22.1%), Mureș (22.2%). 29 counties with data.
Share of the top 10 companies in turnover · %
Highest values: Bacău (99.9%), Bihor (99.8%), Alba (99.2%), Vrancea (99.1%), Vâlcea (97.9%). Lowest: Suceava (50.3%), Harghita (63.2%), Mureș (78.5%), Argeș (81%), Neamț (83.8%). 14 counties with data.
Median turnover · RON
Nationally: 171.28K RON in 2025. Highest values: Călărași (4.14M RON), Ilfov (1.92M RON), Tulcea (1.33M RON), Suceava (1.33M RON), Dâmbovița (1.3M RON). Lowest: Sălaj (0 RON), Olt (0 RON), Brăila (0 RON), Vaslui (7.65K RON), Arad (28.55K RON). 41 counties with data.
Turnover per employee · RON
Nationally: 317.97K RON in 2025. Highest values: București (1.27M RON), Dolj (1.26M RON), Covasna (1.24M RON), Tulcea (886.94K RON), Alba (879.31K RON). Lowest: Olt (0 RON), Iași (152.22K RON), Vaslui (153.67K RON), Giurgiu (200.55K RON), Călărași (223.89K RON). 39 counties with data.
The same aggregates as on the map, also available as tables, with a stable citation for every version.
Analysis: DemoANAF.ro · Prahova · CAEN 1611.
In Prahova, the 2025 report covers 9 companies with available indicators (CAEN 1611). This is the observed sample, not the number of all registered companies.
The median net margin is 8.8% in 2025, computed for 7 companies with positive sales and a known net result, including loss-making companies. 2 companies do not meet these conditions.
0 companies have strictly positive margins of at most 2% (0% of eligible companies). 2 eligible companies have negative margins.
5 of 9 companies with a known net result are profitable: 55.6%. The cumulative net result, after subtracting losses, is 764.86K RON.
The cumulative turnover of the 6 comparable companies changed by +2.4% between 2024 and 2025, in nominal RON.
| Territory / activity | Companies | Sales | Net profit | Employees | Equity | Median margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alba | 37 | 620.78M RON | -9.04M RON | 709 | 263.26M RON | 0.2% |
| Arad | 10 | 12.63M RON | -29.28K RON | 43 | 4.27M RON | 3.1% |
| Argeș | 47 | 115.55M RON | 142.87K RON | 257 | 25.2M RON | 2.4% |
| Bacău | 21 | 291.51M RON | 19.56M RON | 672 | 257.91M RON | 3.6% |
| Bihor | 20 | 25.76M RON | 2.08M RON | 35 | 11.57M RON | 5.3% |
| Bistrița-Năsăud | 45 | 223.91M RON | 18.74M RON | 430 | 118.39M RON | 2.9% |
| Botoșani | 2 | 1.96M RON | 117.69K RON | 8 | 693.98K RON | 6% |
| Brăila | 1 | 0 RON | -4.44K RON | 0 | -32.57K RON | — |
| Brașov | 12 | 68.58M RON | 2.72M RON | 143 | 34.46M RON | 1.3% |
| București | 11 | 406.99M RON | 6.09M RON | 320 | 307.14M RON | 1.1% |
| Buzău | 19 | 14.31M RON | -908.91K RON | 58 | 6.52M RON | 2.4% |
| Călărași | 2 | 8.28M RON | -291.74K RON | 37 | 2.12M RON | -5% |
| Caraș-Severin | 21 | 43.96M RON | 463.61K RON | 165 | 22.7M RON | 0.8% |
| Cluj | 27 | 19.6M RON | -1.7M RON | 85 | 9.28M RON | 0.7% |
| Constanța | 1 | — | 0 RON | — | 200 RON | — |
| Covasna | 18 | 796.2M RON | 34.12M RON | 642 | 558.92M RON | 0.3% |
| Dâmbovița | 7 | 105.93M RON | 3.69M RON | 243 | 65.37M RON | 2.4% |
| Dolj | 2 | 1.65M RON | 1.39M RON | 1 | 1.39M RON | 83.7% |
| Galați | 2 | 280.43K RON | -101.24K RON | 1 | -56.52K RON | -44% |
| Giurgiu | 1 | 200.55K RON | 34.48K RON | 1 | 454.94K RON | 17.2% |
| Gorj | 8 | 5.94M RON | 1.15M RON | 20 | 7.66M RON | 19.4% |
| Harghita | 52 | 98.75M RON | 3.35M RON | 327 | 50.07M RON | 1.5% |
| Hunedoara | 14 | 51.5M RON | 266.95K RON | 167 | 35.33M RON | 6.5% |
| Ialomița | 4 | 6.04M RON | -48.97K RON | 24 | 777.31K RON | 0.8% |
| Iași | 5 | 1.93M RON | 19.52K RON | 12 | 2.81M RON | 3.2% |
| Ilfov | 6 | 13.04M RON | 2.07M RON | 29 | 8.86M RON | 20.3% |
| Maramureș | 46 | 262.6M RON | 329.25K RON | 634 | 139.87M RON | 0.7% |
| Mehedinți | 6 | 13.62M RON | 1.37M RON | 36 | 2.77M RON | 18.6% |
| Mureș | 36 | 47.45M RON | 142.63K RON | 145 | 19.53M RON | 2% |
| Neamț | 57 | 193.36M RON | -8.06M RON | 455 | 17.15M RON | 2% |
| Olt | 3 | 0 RON | -1.39K RON | 1 | -1.14K RON | — |
| Prahova | 9 | 12.76M RON | 764.86K RON | 41 | 10.31M RON | 8.8% |
| Sălaj | 3 | 1.46M RON | 38.42K RON | 6 | 536.66K RON | 4.6% |
| Satu Mare | 7 | 16.23M RON | 1.73M RON | 32 | 15.39M RON | 7.1% |
| Sibiu | 15 | 11.68M RON | -3.33M RON | 41 | -15.99M RON | 1% |
| Suceava | 122 | 452.29M RON | 17.75M RON | 800 | 170.19M RON | 2% |
| Teleorman | 3 | 262K RON | 19.27K RON | 0 | 13.55K RON | 7.5% |
| Timiș | 16 | 166.64M RON | 24.72M RON | 262 | 70.17M RON | 3.2% |
| Tulcea | 2 | 2.66M RON | 170.52K RON | 3 | 227.66K RON | 6.5% |
| Vâlcea | 21 | 28.21M RON | -1.23M RON | 85 | 4.09M RON | 0.7% |
| Territory / activity | Companies | Sales | Net profit | Employees | Equity | Median margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vălenii de Munte | 2 | 2.89M RON | 772.63K RON | 8 | 5.53M RON | 20.7% |
| Drajna | 1 | 1.41M RON | 114.67K RON | 4 | 651.57K RON | 8.1% |
| Drăgănești | 1 | — | -18.75K RON | 1 | -18.55K RON | — |
| Gura Vadului | 1 | 142.57K RON | 12.52K RON | 2 | -45.73K RON | 8.8% |
| Lipănești | 1 | 200K RON | -50.99K RON | 2 | -163 RON | -25.5% |
| Posești | 1 | 0 RON | -1.19K RON | 0 | -12.98K RON | — |
| Teișani | 1 | 24.89K RON | 14.64K RON | 0 | 31.6K RON | 58.8% |
| Vărbilău | 1 | 8.09M RON | -78.66K RON | 24 | 4.18M RON | -1% |
National series independent of CAEN: initiation notices published in 2025, by the authority's current office. Values are estimates, not payments.
| Territory / activity | Notices | Value (RON) |
|---|---|---|
| Brașov | 834 | 5.85B RON |
| Ialomița | 180 | 1.07B RON |
| Iași | 1,086 | 14.34B RON |
| Tulcea | 177 | 1.17B RON |
| Mehedinți | 187 | 918.76M RON |
| Vâlcea | 384 | 2.27B RON |
| Mureș | 740 | 8.41B RON |
| București | 6,659 | 146.69B RON |
| Bacău | 429 | 2.57B RON |
| Maramureș | 371 | 2.83B RON |
| Botoșani | 321 | 1.32B RON |
| Brăila | 358 | 1.49B RON |
| Galați | 577 | 5.68B RON |
| Dâmbovița | 367 | 3.11B RON |
| Caraș-Severin | 241 | 1.42B RON |
| Hunedoara | 482 | 2.3B RON |
| Prahova | 552 | 4.43B RON |
| Călărași | 174 | 765.83M RON |
| Ilfov | 553 | 6.78B RON |
| Constanța | 757 | 7.24B RON |
| Bihor | 658 | 4.49B RON |
| Sibiu | 908 | 5.72B RON |
| Timiș | 915 | 8.62B RON |
| Olt | 304 | 1.2B RON |
| Cluj | 1,484 | 15.53B RON |
| Vaslui | 366 | 1.65B RON |
| Giurgiu | 171 | 1.94B RON |
| Neamț | 346 | 1.76B RON |
| Gorj | 601 | 3.25B RON |
| Sălaj | 265 | 1.1B RON |
| Alba | 359 | 1.58B RON |
| Suceava | 567 | 3.91B RON |
| Argeș | 532 | 2.2B RON |
| Dolj | 661 | 13.33B RON |
| Bistrița-Năsăud | 272 | 1.71B RON |
| Teleorman | 229 | 1.58B RON |
| Arad | 386 | 3.25B RON |
| Buzău | 278 | 1.02B RON |
| Vrancea | 277 | 3.31B RON |
| Covasna | 255 | 1.01B RON |
| Harghita | 333 | 2.68B RON |
| Satu Mare | 291 | 2.55B RON |
| Județ necunoscut | 22 | 21.89M RON |
| UAT Ploiești | 257 | 3.33B RON |
| UAT Șoimari | 1 | 8.67M RON |
| UAT Izvoarele | 5 | 13.53M RON |
| UAT Tătaru | 1 | 1.15M RON |
| UAT Predeal-Sărari | 2 | 3.43M RON |
| UAT Berceni | 4 | 57.58M RON |
| UAT Balta Doamnei | 1 | 24.93M RON |
| UAT Brazi | 3 | 4.93M RON |
| UAT Teișani | 6 | 5.88M RON |
| UAT Păcureți | 2 | 10.19M RON |
| UAT Gura Vitioarei | 3 | 13.5M RON |
| UAT Șirna | 1 | 2.74M RON |
| UAT Câmpina | 22 | 132.88M RON |
| UAT Telega | 1 | 1.8M RON |
| UAT Florești | 1 | 3.15M RON |
| UAT Provița de Jos | 2 | 2.97M RON |
| UAT Poienarii Burchii | 1 | 449.81K RON |
| UAT Plopeni | 6 | 3.99M RON |
| UAT Provița de Sus | 1 | 931.79K RON |
| UAT Măneciu | 2 | 23.26M RON |
| UAT Fulga | 1 | 532K RON |
| UAT Filipeștii de Pădure | 3 | 17.73M RON |
| UAT Drajna | 2 | 11.27M RON |
| UAT Lipănești | 5 | 14.19M RON |
| UAT Cărbunești | 1 | 3.14M RON |
| UAT Măgureni | 2 | 1.14M RON |
| UAT Bănești | 1 | 4M RON |
| UAT Poiana Câmpina | 7 | 9.47M RON |
| UAT Șotrile | 1 | 626.86K RON |
| UAT Blejoi | 23 | 26.33M RON |
| UAT Vadu Săpat | 2 | 2.93M RON |
Computed on 9/18/2026, 8:47:03 PM · version 20260918174703963. Annual data may be revised when new balance sheets arrive.
DemoANAF.ro. Romania business report 2025 — Prahova, CAEN 1611. Version 20260918174703963, computed on 2026-09-18T17:47:03.963Z. https://demoanaf.ro/en/raport-afaceri-romania-2025?judet=Prahova&caen=1611#date-raport Data: https://demoanaf.ro/rapoarte/afaceri-romania-2025/date.csv?rev=20260918174703963
SRL, SRL-D and SA registrations observed in Romania. National series, independent of the financial filters.
Most new companies appeared in July: 10,734 observed registrations.
Earliest available registration for each CUI · coverage not confirmed
Solid line: 2025
| Month | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Jan | 6,313 |
| Feb | 8,206 |
| Mar | 8,589 |
| Apr | 7,449 |
| May | 8,145 |
| Jun | 7,682 |
| Jul | 10,734 |
| Aug | 7,697 |
| Sep | 9,208 |
| Oct | 9,472 |
| Nov | 9,682 |
| Dec | 7,334 |
Coverage not confirmed: differences between series may reflect missing data. Months without observations do not mean zero.
Pace of distinct contracts recorded in SEAP. National series, by contract date.
The month with the most SEAP contracts was April: 12,765 distinct contracts.
A contract's lots and suppliers are not counted as separate contracts
Solid line: 2025
| Month | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Jan | 10,684 |
| Feb | 9,665 |
| Mar | 11,690 |
| Apr | 12,765 |
| May | 11,213 |
| Jun | 9,725 |
| Jul | 9,714 |
| Aug | 9,094 |
| Sep | 9,436 |
| Oct | 12,761 |
| Nov | 12,032 |
| Dec | 9,769 |
Period coverage is not confirmed. We count contracts, not payments; awarded values are not actual spending.
Every percentage must have a clear population, a period and a source.
We analyse companies with financial indicators available for 2025. This is not a census of all companies and does not implicitly cover only SRL/SA. The coverage of each indicator is shown separately.
Annual balance sheets do not measure H1 2026 results. Companies are linked by CUI. We compare only values available in both years. Geographic and CAEN groups are those of the 2025 cohort; we do not measure relocations or sector changes.
We use the main code from the balance sheet, normalised to four digits. Authorised activities are not summed. Short titles describe the activities; the exact Rev.2 and Rev.3 definitions sit next to each code. Where they differ, both are shown, without assuming the company's revision or historical equivalence.
A missing value stays unknown. Margins require positive turnover and a known net result, including losses. The median treats every company equally. The aggregate margin uses the sums of profit and sales for exactly the same eligible companies. The bands are: below 0%, exactly 0%, above 0% up to and including 2%, above 2% up to and including 5%, above 5% up to and including 10%, and above 10%. They are not solvency thresholds. Growth rates are undefined when the baseline is zero or negative.
Capital means equity (I10), including negative values, not turnover or share capital. Employees are the reported annual averages, attributed to the current office; the per-company average uses only companies with this indicator known. Tenders are initiation notices published in 2025, located by the authority's current office. Values are estimates, not payments. Colours use fixed numeric references, not ranks or quartiles. Margins have references at −10%, 0%, 2%, 5%, 10% and 20%; extreme values keep the exact number but saturate the colour. Totals use a logarithmic magnitude scale with references in the indicator's units. Each territory has a single observed value; we do not interpolate between localities. The same value keeps the same colour when the county, local unit or CAEN changes. Hatched areas have no values available. Local-unit boundaries come from ANCPI, processed by geo-spatial.org (2025). Localities are linked to local units through the INS SIRUTA 2025 nomenclature. Ambiguous addresses stay in the county total; local units use references adapted to local magnitude, constant across counties and years.
All amounts are reported in RON. Conversion to EUR uses the annual average rate published by BNR for the report year; for USD, and for years without a published average, we use the arithmetic mean of the European Central Bank's daily reference rates. Today's rate is never used. It is an indicative conversion for comparison, not an accounting revaluation.
The report is recomputed periodically from the available data. The generation date does not prove the source is complete. Changes to balance sheets may revise this edition's results.
Sources: ANAF — balance sheets; ONRC — company register; SEAP / data.gov.ro — contracts. See the data sources. Download the SVG map · ANCPI boundaries · geo-spatial.org · INS · SIRUTA 2025
