Capital, people and business. Discover the differences on the map.
42 TERRITORIES · BALANCE SHEETS AND TENDERS 2025
Equity · RON
41 of 42 territories with values · Relative scale across counties in this selection · square-root spacing, anchored at zero. Colours are recalculated when the selection changes.▧ No data
Bistrița-Năsăud · Tăierea și rindeluirea lemnului · CAEN 1610 · balance sheets available for 2025
Sales
+3.6%
105 comparable companies · 2025 / 2024
Profitability
1.3%
104 eligible companies · 57.8% of companies with a known result are profitable
Concentration
64.7%
Share of the selection's turnover · 2025
Updated 9/18/2026, 8:47:03 PM · balance sheets 2025 / 2024
Turnover and jobs, by the companies' current registered office. Pick a county from the list to continue the analysis.
Bistrița-Năsăud holds 3.2% of observed sales in the selected sector, with 128 companies.
Top 8 · 2025 balance sheets · share of the located-county total
Top 8 by reported average headcount · share of the located-county total
Compare the main activities in Bistrița-Năsăud. Open a sector for details.
In Fabricarea de echipamente electrice și electronice pentru autovehicule și pentru motoare de autovehicule, ten companies make 100% of sales. In Transport rutier de mărfuri, only 27.1%.
SECTOR RADIOGRAPHY
Concentration extremes among the top 8 sectors by turnover · share of observed sales, not market share
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
1.56B RON
629 comparable
69.9%
69.9%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
1.55B RON
673 comparable
27.1%
27.1%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
1.49B RON
263 comparable
71.5%
71.5%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
1.22B RON
4 comparable
100%
100%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
1.16B RON
46 comparable
95.9%
95.9%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
884.93M RON
7 comparable
100%
100%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
795.98M RON
18 comparable
99.8%
99.8%
The definitions differ between revisions. Figures are grouped by the code reported in the balance sheet; each company's revision is not confirmed.
787.09M RON
489 comparable
41.6%
41.6%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
618.75M RON
1 comparable
100%
100%
The main activity from the balance sheet. The name describes the code, not all of the company's authorised activities.
551.38M RON
9 comparable
100%
100%
One company, one main code. Growth uses the same companies in both years; missing values remain "—". CAEN definitions sit next to each name.
Beyond the giants: sales and margin of the company in the middle of the distribution.
The typical company sells 227.26K RON a year and keeps 1.3% of sales as net profit.
Companies by margin band · net profit / positive turnover
104 companies with a known profit and positive sales; 24 excluded. Bands describe margins, not bankruptcy risk.
Same companies, two years. Compare the change in sales with the change in jobs.
50.5% of the 105 comparable companies sold more in 2025 than in 2024.
Number of companies with comparable data, split by direction of change
Nominal changes in RON, not adjusted for inflation. Companies without data in one of the years are not compared.
Growth, survival, concentration, the trade register and state dependence in 2025: the national figure and the counties at both ends, for every map layer.
Turnover change at the same companies · % vs 2025−1
Nationally: +3.6% in 2025. Highest values: Galați (+58%), București (+53.3%), Botoșani (+46%), Bihor (+27%), Olt (+26.9%). Lowest: Arad (-34.4%), Prahova (-9.6%), Maramureș (-2.1%), Cluj (-1.5%), Vâlcea (-0.7%). 36 counties with data.
Average annual turnover growth at the same companies · % per year, 5 years
Nationally: +6.9% in 2025. Highest values: Gorj (+17.2%), Hunedoara (+13.6%), Suceava (+11%), Botoșani (+11%), Sibiu (+9.5%). Lowest: Constanța (-9.3%), București (-9.2%), Mehedinți (-7.8%), Caraș-Severin (-7.2%), Arad (-4.1%). 34 counties with data.
Companies that filed five years ago and still file in 2025 · %
Nationally: 67.6% in 2025. Highest values: Dâmbovița (89.7%), Brăila (88.9%), Mehedinți (85.7%), Harghita (85.5%), Giurgiu (84.6%). Lowest: Vaslui (54.5%), Galați (54.5%), Buzău (55.7%), Caraș-Severin (58.3%), Iași (59.6%). 40 counties with data.
Companies with a net loss · % of those reporting a result
Nationally: 31.3% in 2025. Highest values: Ialomița (80%), Ilfov (62.5%), Buzău (61.9%), București (60.6%), Brăila (57.1%). Lowest: Satu Mare (15.8%), Dolj (16.7%), Gorj (23.1%), Neamț (24%), Galați (25%). 39 counties with data.
Companies with negative equity · % of those reporting equity
Nationally: 25.8% in 2025. Highest values: Constanța (86.7%), Giurgiu (83.3%), Ialomița (80%), Ilfov (75%), Buzău (57.1%). Lowest: Olt (14.3%), Neamț (17.1%), Caraș-Severin (23.7%), Bistrița-Năsăud (25.8%), Suceava (26.1%). 39 counties with data.
Share of the top 10 companies in turnover · %
Nationally: 64.7% in 2025. Highest values: Buzău (99.4%), Sălaj (98.4%), București (96.6%), Mureș (95.8%), Timiș (94%). Lowest: Suceava (27.8%), Alba (38.9%), Neamț (43.6%), Harghita (51.1%), Argeș (54.4%). 27 counties with data.
Median turnover · RON
Nationally: 227.26K RON in 2025. Highest values: Olt (796.28K RON), Covasna (706.63K RON), Botoșani (592.45K RON), Neamț (483.55K RON), Suceava (467.29K RON). Lowest: Giurgiu (0 RON), Constanța (0 RON), Ilfov (1.78K RON), Mehedinți (4.04K RON), Ialomița (8.51K RON). 41 counties with data.
Turnover per employee · RON
Nationally: 388.84K RON in 2025. Highest values: Constanța (1.32M RON), Mureș (813.58K RON), Bihor (581.87K RON), Ilfov (545.43K RON), Suceava (526.33K RON). Lowest: Ialomița (21.74K RON), Teleorman (33.32K RON), Călărași (62.21K RON), Olt (165.55K RON), București (171.95K RON). 40 counties with data.
The same aggregates as on the map, also available as tables, with a stable citation for every version.
Analysis: DemoANAF.ro · Bistrița-Năsăud · CAEN 1610.
In Bistrița-Năsăud, the 2025 report covers 128 companies with available indicators (CAEN 1610). This is the observed sample, not the number of all registered companies.
The median net margin is 1.3% in 2025, computed for 104 companies with positive sales and a known net result, including loss-making companies. 24 companies do not meet these conditions.
21 companies have strictly positive margins of at most 2% (20.2% of eligible companies). 32 eligible companies have negative margins.
74 of 128 companies with a known net result are profitable: 57.8%. The cumulative net result, after subtracting losses, is 720.55K RON.
The cumulative turnover of the 105 comparable companies changed by +3.6% between 2024 and 2025, in nominal RON.
Prundu Bârgăului (Bistrița-Năsăud), CAEN 1610, 2025: 4 located companies, 35 employees reported, 1.29M RON net result and -1.1% median net margin (3 eligible companies).
| Territory / activity | Companies | Sales | Net profit | Employees | Equity | Median margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alba | 160 | 100.11M RON | 575.74K RON | 331 | 20.98M RON | 0.6% |
| Arad | 38 | 31.68M RON | 1.06M RON | 94 | 24.93M RON | 2.1% |
| Argeș | 121 | 148.86M RON | 3.95M RON | 432 | 23.98M RON | 2% |
| Bacău | 76 | 87.09M RON | 144.81K RON | 297 | 24.13M RON | 1.6% |
| Bihor | 59 | 70.46M RON | 6.57M RON | 121 | 23.87M RON | 1.5% |
| Bistrița-Năsăud | 128 | 127.36M RON | 720.55K RON | 326 | 71.83M RON | 1.3% |
| Botoșani | 10 | 11.7M RON | 785.48K RON | 28 | 3.21M RON | 4.7% |
| Brăila | 7 | 6.77M RON | 229.3K RON | 36 | 3.07M RON | 0.5% |
| Brașov | 54 | 124.55M RON | 6.64M RON | 376 | 27.25M RON | 2.8% |
| București | 33 | 27.33M RON | 711.26K RON | 80 | -6.46M RON | -0.5% |
| Buzău | 21 | 59.59M RON | 1.06M RON | 143 | 40.83M RON | -7.4% |
| Călărași | 3 | 62.21K RON | -46.82K RON | 1 | -35.94K RON | -71.9% |
| Caraș-Severin | 59 | 72.23M RON | -8.11M RON | 203 | 34.29M RON | 0.8% |
| Cluj | 85 | 29.41M RON | -422.89K RON | 124 | 8.02M RON | -5.3% |
| Constanța | 15 | 16M RON | 543.98K RON | 13 | -7.25M RON | 14.8% |
| Covasna | 61 | 121.39M RON | 3.55M RON | 407 | 49.21M RON | 1.7% |
| Dâmbovița | 30 | 60.06M RON | 10.04M RON | 128 | 39.15M RON | 1.8% |
| Dolj | 6 | 2.79M RON | 720.73K RON | 12 | -28.33K RON | 16.2% |
| Galați | 8 | 626.05K RON | 54.73K RON | 3 | 91.77K RON | 17.1% |
| Giurgiu | 6 | 80.48K RON | -26.21K RON | 3 | -2.79M RON | 89.2% |
| Gorj | 40 | 49.34M RON | 1.45M RON | 200 | 7.81M RON | 2% |
| Harghita | 206 | 275.31M RON | 8.38M RON | 833 | 107.11M RON | 1.6% |
| Hunedoara | 52 | 68.25M RON | -698.07K RON | 198 | -16.95M RON | 0.9% |
| Ialomița | 5 | 152.92K RON | -274.27K RON | 5 | -480.1K RON | -540.7% |
| Iași | 29 | 25.02M RON | 2.37M RON | 72 | 10.52M RON | 1.7% |
| Ilfov | 8 | 2.28M RON | 92.4K RON | 4 | 539.58K RON | -86.2% |
| Județ necunoscut | 3 | 313.78K RON | 34.1K RON | 2 | -204.32K RON | 11% |
| Maramureș | 126 | 205.74M RON | 10.36M RON | 573 | 125.51M RON | 2.2% |
| Mehedinți | 9 | 8.36M RON | 471.67K RON | 42 | 9.33M RON | 9.2% |
| Mureș | 91 | 869M RON | -11.8M RON | 1,069 | 320.28M RON | 1.9% |
| Neamț | 146 | 289.87M RON | 7.43M RON | 812 | 111.29M RON | 2.5% |
| Olt | 7 | 8.01M RON | 328.24K RON | 46 | 9.56M RON | 5.9% |
| Prahova | 57 | 47.26M RON | -597.83K RON | 171 | -8.73M RON | 0.2% |
| Sălaj | 29 | 8.11M RON | -26.43K RON | 36 | 4.05M RON | -18.3% |
| Satu Mare | 19 | 17.93M RON | 759.19K RON | 58 | 4.31M RON | 3.7% |
| Sibiu | 41 | 114.24M RON | 4.71M RON | 223 | 18.49M RON | 2.9% |
| Suceava | 357 | 627.49M RON | 16.94M RON | 1,178 | 189.08M RON | 1.6% |
| Teleorman | 4 | 200.39K RON | -127.19K RON | 5 | -135.04K RON | 7.6% |
| Timiș | 34 | 62.9M RON | 1.74M RON | 180 | 4.98M RON | 5.4% |
| Vâlcea | 54 | 126.15M RON | 2.9M RON | 362 | 52.14M RON | 1.6% |
| Territory / activity | Companies | Sales | Net profit | Employees | Equity | Median margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dumitrița | 2 | 542.55K RON | 4.43K RON | 2 | 103.38K RON | 0.8% |
| Bistrița | 12 | 4.22M RON | -785.14K RON | 24 | 2.49M RON | -17.3% |
| Beclean | 2 | 902.52K RON | -74.63K RON | 4 | 405.04K RON | -4.4% |
| Năsăud | 1 | 18K RON | 14.22K RON | 3 | -13.4K RON | 79% |
| Sângeorz-Băi | 5 | 826.87K RON | 146.5K RON | 7 | 370.14K RON | 12.7% |
| Bistrița Bârgăului | 15 | 4.98M RON | 75.08K RON | 22 | 2.75M RON | 3% |
| Cetate | 1 | 4.45M RON | 888 RON | 10 | 2.25M RON | 0% |
| Chiuza | 1 | 1.04M RON | 281.4K RON | 4 | 591.27K RON | 27% |
| Coșbuc | 2 | 41.68M RON | 472.22K RON | 41 | 27.67M RON | 1.8% |
| Feldru | 1 | 836.06K RON | 1.51K RON | 7 | 566.04K RON | 0.2% |
| Ilva Mare | 3 | 487.81K RON | 62.22K RON | 4 | 781.76K RON | 21.7% |
| Ilva Mica | 1 | 1.25M RON | 44.8K RON | 3 | 1.88M RON | 3.6% |
| Josenii Bârgăului | 8 | 8.72M RON | 381.33K RON | 22 | 3.32M RON | 7.8% |
| Lechința | 2 | 0 RON | -17 RON | 0 | -26.86K RON | — |
| Leșu | 4 | 1.9M RON | -241.09K RON | 11 | 1.46M RON | -48.1% |
| Livezile | 2 | 23.75K RON | -299.06K RON | 0 | -13.7K RON | -1,259.2% |
| Lunca Ilvei | 2 | 3.29M RON | 267.35K RON | 12 | 921.91K RON | 8.1% |
| Maieru | 5 | 3.02M RON | -112.26K RON | 15 | 1.1M RON | 4.1% |
| Prundu Bârgăului | 4 | 20.33M RON | 1.29M RON | 35 | 11.55M RON | -1.1% |
| Rebrișoara | 1 | 0 RON | 0 RON | 0 | 11.03K RON | — |
| Rodna | 5 | 845.51K RON | -54.44K RON | 5 | 386.96K RON | 0.1% |
| Romuli | 1 | 1.76M RON | 65.73K RON | 7 | 2.62M RON | 3.7% |
| Șanț | 9 | 1.72M RON | -62.1K RON | 9 | 1.48M RON | 0.5% |
| Șieu-Măgheruș | 1 | 425.08K RON | 2.16K RON | 1 | 342.76K RON | 0.5% |
| Telciu | 6 | 4.51M RON | -720.91K RON | 21 | -232.83K RON | 0.1% |
| Tiha Bârgăului | 30 | 16.95M RON | -117.92K RON | 47 | 7.35M RON | 1.2% |
| Târlișua | 1 | 829.75K RON | 68.3K RON | 4 | 143.16K RON | 8.2% |
National series independent of CAEN: initiation notices published in 2025, by the authority's current office. Values are estimates, not payments.
| Territory / activity | Notices | Value (RON) |
|---|---|---|
| Brașov | 834 | 5.85B RON |
| Ialomița | 180 | 1.07B RON |
| Iași | 1,086 | 14.34B RON |
| Tulcea | 177 | 1.17B RON |
| Mehedinți | 187 | 918.76M RON |
| Vâlcea | 384 | 2.27B RON |
| Mureș | 740 | 8.41B RON |
| București | 6,659 | 146.69B RON |
| Bacău | 429 | 2.57B RON |
| Maramureș | 371 | 2.83B RON |
| Botoșani | 321 | 1.32B RON |
| Brăila | 358 | 1.49B RON |
| Galați | 577 | 5.68B RON |
| Dâmbovița | 367 | 3.11B RON |
| Caraș-Severin | 241 | 1.42B RON |
| Hunedoara | 482 | 2.3B RON |
| Prahova | 552 | 4.43B RON |
| Călărași | 174 | 765.83M RON |
| Ilfov | 553 | 6.78B RON |
| Constanța | 757 | 7.24B RON |
| Bihor | 658 | 4.49B RON |
| Sibiu | 908 | 5.72B RON |
| Timiș | 915 | 8.62B RON |
| Olt | 304 | 1.2B RON |
| Cluj | 1,484 | 15.53B RON |
| Vaslui | 366 | 1.65B RON |
| Giurgiu | 171 | 1.94B RON |
| Neamț | 346 | 1.76B RON |
| Gorj | 601 | 3.25B RON |
| Sălaj | 265 | 1.1B RON |
| Alba | 359 | 1.58B RON |
| Suceava | 567 | 3.91B RON |
| Argeș | 532 | 2.2B RON |
| Dolj | 661 | 13.33B RON |
| Bistrița-Năsăud | 272 | 1.71B RON |
| Teleorman | 229 | 1.58B RON |
| Arad | 386 | 3.25B RON |
| Buzău | 278 | 1.02B RON |
| Vrancea | 277 | 3.31B RON |
| Covasna | 255 | 1.01B RON |
| Harghita | 333 | 2.68B RON |
| Satu Mare | 291 | 2.55B RON |
| Județ necunoscut | 22 | 21.89M RON |
| UAT Bistrița | 121 | 1.19B RON |
| UAT Josenii Bârgăului | 2 | 990K RON |
| UAT Rodna | 4 | 5.54M RON |
| UAT Telciu | 11 | 3.16M RON |
| UAT Șanț | 1 | 504.2K RON |
| UAT Salva | 1 | 8.04M RON |
Computed on 9/18/2026, 8:47:03 PM · version 20260918174703963. Annual data may be revised when new balance sheets arrive.
DemoANAF.ro. Romania business report 2025 — Bistrița-Năsăud, CAEN 1610, Prundu Bârgăului. Version 20260918174703963, computed on 2026-09-18T17:47:03.963Z. https://demoanaf.ro/en/raport-afaceri-romania-2025?judet=Bistri%C8%9Ba-N%C4%83s%C4%83ud&caen=1610&uat=34235#date-raport Data: https://demoanaf.ro/rapoarte/afaceri-romania-2025/date.csv?rev=20260918174703963
SRL, SRL-D and SA registrations observed in Romania. National series, independent of the financial filters.
Most new companies appeared in July: 10,734 observed registrations.
Earliest available registration for each CUI · coverage not confirmed
Solid line: 2025
| Month | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Jan | 6,313 |
| Feb | 8,206 |
| Mar | 8,589 |
| Apr | 7,449 |
| May | 8,145 |
| Jun | 7,682 |
| Jul | 10,734 |
| Aug | 7,697 |
| Sep | 9,208 |
| Oct | 9,472 |
| Nov | 9,682 |
| Dec | 7,334 |
Coverage not confirmed: differences between series may reflect missing data. Months without observations do not mean zero.
Pace of distinct contracts recorded in SEAP. National series, by contract date.
The month with the most SEAP contracts was April: 12,765 distinct contracts.
A contract's lots and suppliers are not counted as separate contracts
Solid line: 2025
| Month | 2025 |
|---|---|
| Jan | 10,684 |
| Feb | 9,665 |
| Mar | 11,690 |
| Apr | 12,765 |
| May | 11,213 |
| Jun | 9,725 |
| Jul | 9,714 |
| Aug | 9,094 |
| Sep | 9,436 |
| Oct | 12,761 |
| Nov | 12,032 |
| Dec | 9,769 |
Period coverage is not confirmed. We count contracts, not payments; awarded values are not actual spending.
Every percentage must have a clear population, a period and a source.
We analyse companies with financial indicators available for 2025. This is not a census of all companies and does not implicitly cover only SRL/SA. The coverage of each indicator is shown separately.
Annual balance sheets do not measure H1 2026 results. Companies are linked by CUI. We compare only values available in both years. Geographic and CAEN groups are those of the 2025 cohort; we do not measure relocations or sector changes.
We use the main code from the balance sheet, normalised to four digits. Authorised activities are not summed. Short titles describe the activities; the exact Rev.2 and Rev.3 definitions sit next to each code. Where they differ, both are shown, without assuming the company's revision or historical equivalence.
A missing value stays unknown. Margins require positive turnover and a known net result, including losses. The median treats every company equally. The aggregate margin uses the sums of profit and sales for exactly the same eligible companies. The bands are: below 0%, exactly 0%, above 0% up to and including 2%, above 2% up to and including 5%, above 5% up to and including 10%, and above 10%. They are not solvency thresholds. Growth rates are undefined when the baseline is zero or negative.
Capital means equity (I10), including negative values, not turnover or share capital. Employees are the reported annual averages, attributed to the current office; the per-company average uses only companies with this indicator known. Tenders are initiation notices published in 2025, located by the authority's current office. Values are estimates, not payments. Colours use fixed numeric references, not ranks or quartiles. Margins have references at −10%, 0%, 2%, 5%, 10% and 20%; extreme values keep the exact number but saturate the colour. Totals use a logarithmic magnitude scale with references in the indicator's units. Each territory has a single observed value; we do not interpolate between localities. The same value keeps the same colour when the county, local unit or CAEN changes. Hatched areas have no values available. Local-unit boundaries come from ANCPI, processed by geo-spatial.org (2025). Localities are linked to local units through the INS SIRUTA 2025 nomenclature. Ambiguous addresses stay in the county total; local units use references adapted to local magnitude, constant across counties and years.
All amounts are reported in RON. Conversion to EUR uses the annual average rate published by BNR for the report year; for USD, and for years without a published average, we use the arithmetic mean of the European Central Bank's daily reference rates. Today's rate is never used. It is an indicative conversion for comparison, not an accounting revaluation.
The report is recomputed periodically from the available data. The generation date does not prove the source is complete. Changes to balance sheets may revise this edition's results.
Sources: ANAF — balance sheets; ONRC — company register; SEAP / data.gov.ro — contracts. See the data sources. Download the SVG map · ANCPI boundaries · geo-spatial.org · INS · SIRUTA 2025
